Context is King How to Set Up Hearsay
Hearsay is when a witness in court tries to quote someone who is not a witness in the case about something that the witness claims that person said. Hearsay is defined as a statement (an assertion) other than one made by the declarant while testifying at the trial or hearing, offered in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted.
Hearsay is inadmissible, except when it is admissible. Many statements that seem like hearsay actually aren’t. For instance, a question from a third party (“Did you call the police?” or “Did you bring a raincoat?”) is not an assertion, and therefore not hearsay. An opposing party’s admission (“Yes, I was driving 20 miles per hour over the speed limit”) is explicitly excluded from the hearsay rule. Even statements offered to prove something other than the truth—like a new husband telling a child a false story to alienate the biological father—are not hearsay because they are offered to show the destructive behavior, not to prove the false story is true.
And even when a statement is hearsay, there are numerous exceptions, such as statements made for medical diagnosis, or a “state of mind” exception where a victim says, “He has been hitting me and he threatened me and I am afraid of him.” So, how do you get these statements admitted? Context. Whether you are trying to prove a statement is non-hearsay or fits into an exception, context is everything. Many lawyers fail to build this context on the front end, leading to entirely preventable courtroom disasters.
The “Wrong Way” (Most Common)
The most common mistake trial lawyers make is rushing to the finish line. They know the juicy quote they want the jury to hear, and they go straight for it without laying the groundwork. Here is how that typical exchange looks:
Q: Where were you on the night of the accident?
A: I was standing on the corner of 4th and Main.
Q: And what did the bystander say to you?
Opposing Counsel: Objection, Your Honor! Hearsay.
Judge: Sustained. The jury will disregard the question.
Lawyer: But Your Honor, it’s an excited utterance!
Judge: Counsel, you haven’t laid any foundation to show this person was excited or that an event even occurred. Proceed with your next question.
Now, the lawyer is forced to backtrack. A messy, awkward fight ensues between the lawyer, the witness, the judge, and the opponent to retroactively “lay the foundation.” The lawyer has to desperately try to squeeze out the contextual details to prove the exception applies.
If this foundation had been laid beforehand, it would have streamlined the presentation, kept the jury engaged, and drastically increased the likelihood of the statement’s admission.
Setting the Stage
When you use open-ended questions to develop context through firsthand observations, before, during, and after the hearsay utterance, you do more than just defeat a hearsay objection. You paint a vivid picture for the judge and jury. Often, this contextual buildup is so effective that it actually reduces the need for reliance on the hearsay statement itself.
Example 1: The Excited Utterance
An excited utterance is a statement relating to a startling event, made while the declarant was under the stress of excitement that it caused. Here is how to lay the foundation properly:
Q: Where were you standing at 9:00 PM?
A: Inside the bank, right by the main doors.
Q: What was the atmosphere like in the bank at that moment?
A: It was quiet, just a few people in line.
Q: What, if anything, disrupted that quiet?
A: The front doors crashed open. A man sprinted in wearing a ski mask.
Q: What did you observe about the people around you when that happened?
A: Everyone froze. The woman next to me dropped her purse. She was physically shaking, gasping for air, and she backed up against the wall.
Q: How much time passed between the man sprinting in and the woman reacting?
A: It was instant. Seconds.
Q: While she was shaking and backed against the wall, what did she say?
A: She screamed, “Oh my God, he’s got a gun!”
Why this works: By the time you ask for the statement, the judge already knows the answer to the hearsay objection. You established the startling event (a man in a ski mask crashing through the doors), the contemporaneous timeframe (instant), and the stress of the excitement (shaking, gasping, dropping her purse). Opposing counsel might not even bother objecting, and if they do, the judge will quickly overrule it.
Example 2: The Spontaneous Utterance (Present Sense Impression)
A spontaneous utterance (or present sense impression) is a statement describing or explaining an event or condition, made while or immediately after the declarant perceived it. It doesn’t require panic or excitement, just immediate observation.
Q: Where were you and your friend John driving on Saturday afternoon?
A: We were cruising down the right lane of Highway 41.
Q: What were the traffic conditions like?
A: Pretty heavy. Everyone was moving at about the speed limit, maybe 65 miles per hour.
Q: As you were looking out the windshield, what did you see in your rearview mirror?
A: I saw a sports car weaving through the lanes behind us, closing the distance really fast.
Q: What was John doing at that exact moment?
A: He was looking in his side mirror, watching the same car.
Q: As the sports car blew past your window, what did John say?
A: He said, “Wow, that guy has to be doing at least 100.”
Why this works: The context is bulletproof. You established that John was in a position to perceive the event (looking in the side mirror), what the event was (a speeding car weaving through traffic), and the timing of the statement (exactly as the car blew past the window).
The Bottom Line
Just because a witness relies on or refers to what someone else said does not mean the case is lost.
To win these evidentiary battles, you must gather as much information as possible about the context of the statements. Properly preparing witnesses to walk through the “who, what, where, when, and how” before they ever get to the “what was said” anticipates and avoids hearsay problems. It turns a potential roadblock into a compelling, admission-ready narrative.
© 2026 Bundy Law. All Rights Reserved.
Digital Marketing By: 